John Deaton argues that Sam Bankman-Fried’s 25-year prison sentence is fair. He rejects claims of leniency and insists that further charges, including those against SBF’s parents, are warranted due to fraudulent behaviors.
While some members of the crypto community believe the sentence is too harsh, Deaton asserts that SBF’s mismanagement and lack of remorse justify the punishment. He also calls for a revisit of dismissed campaign finance fraud charges.
Leave a Reply